Complaint Details

Status	:	Closed
Complaint No	:	0101207/2017
Category	:	Non-Compliance
Date	:	09-12-2017
Subject Line	:	Non performance of the duties within the frame of Law
Complainant	:	Meghashyam Rawool
Address	:	B/102,New Venkatesh CHS Ltd;
Complainee	:	New Venkatesh CHS Ltd;and Dy. Registrars
Address	:

Complaint Details
Respected Sir,
The Managing committee of our housing society having total 84 members, appointed a new committee for the further period of five years,in AGM dated 23.05.2010,wherein it has been resolved that the bond in M-20 is no more required for the newly elected members as it is expensive. And if at all anybody complains against this resolution he will be served notice through lawyer and fees paid to him will be recovered from him/her.On the vary date it was obligatory to furnish the bond in form M-20 within the specific period of 45 days,failing to which the MC was deemed to have vacated the office,as defined under section 73(1AB)of MCS Act 1960.The Mumbai High Court also delivered a verdict in a similar type of one case.This condition was further relaxed by govt. circular dated 06.09.2012.
The MC of our society has not furnished the same but took recourse of this resolution and passed a resolution in its monthly meeting that,to reply my "Unnecessary Correspondence" the advocate is appointed and his legal fees is levied in my monthly maintenance bill.I demanded this resolution severally,also under RTI from Dy.Registrar but failed.The disgraceful thing is that the Dy.Registrar of Vasai Taluka as well as The Dy. Registrar (Housing) of Maharashtra State has remarked my various complaint letters as "Unnecessary Correspondence". The charges have been levied in my monthly maintenance bill. My complain letters contains the serious misconduct,and irregularities of MC.One of which is hacking of trees and destruction of greenery of our complex which is not allowed as per by-law 161.
Since the Dy.Reg. remains a moot witness to this unlawful acts,as he might have some collusion with MC,I have lodged the repeated complaints to Joint Divisional Registrar,Commissioner and also to Mantraly.What I experienced during the course of last two years that,the respective higher authority has been tossing up the ball from this court to that court as if it is non of our job and redirects the applications to Distric and Taluka Registrar office for necessary action.

Further no election has been held and again the new committee is formed in AGM held in Sept.17.

Since The Dy. Reg. of Taluka & District level violate laws,rules by-laws even constitutional amendment and do not perform their duties as the public servants, within the frame of law they should liable to sack and send home.
you are requested to put your guidelines.
Solicit your co-operation.
Thanks.

Replies