Complaint Details

Status	:	Closed
Complaint No	:	0004105/2013
Category	:	Business & Finance
Date	:	07-04-2013
Subject Line	:	cheating
Complainant	:	sathya cumaran
Address	:	26a/20 3rd street nethajo nagar ashok nagar chennai
Complainee	:	india infoline stock broking firm
Address	:	mumbai

Complaint Details
JUSTICE DENIED SEEKING JUSTICE

I have opened my trading account with M/S INDIA INFOLINE LTD on 11-07-2005 having trading DEMAT ACCOUNT NO 10385789 and client code as dsathyak
Requesting for physical form all the proofs such as contract slips ledger balances and holding statements my letter dated 23-08-2005 Till date not honoured
Removing me from margin Funding my letter dated 23-08-2005 Till date not honoured
Letter for Non Receipt of DIS booklet dated 12/02/2006 Till date not honoured
Non Receipt of Physical Contract slip and Reliance shares 150 dated 01/03/2006 Till date not honoured
Temporarily requesting for suspension of trade 23/03/2006 Till date not honoured
Forgery of Investors signature
Revocation of POA 27/07/2006 Till date not honoured
Confession letter of Your Company RM S.A.prabhu
Whose signature tallies with the signature which he had autographed in the opening kit of IIFL if that is true and valid signature and this signature and all his signature is true and valid and its not the responsibility of the investor to verify whether the signature of the employee is valid or not its the morale responsibility of the company to honour the customer request

D.SATHYA CUMARAN








DEMAT ACCOUNT NO 10385789
I have been cheated by India Infoline stock broking firm at which has its head office at mumbai and i have been corresponding with company and the company had violated all the rules of stock exchanges and this matter had been brought to the notice of nse bse and sebi and till date these institution had not taken my case infact they have taken an case filed by IIFL vs sathya cumaran which was my thrid point of my enclosure when first two points had not been taken how can the sebi and nse bse could take up the case there had been denial of justice.
sathya cumaran

Replies